A POLITICALLY INCORRECT HISTORY OF THE CRUSADES (PART SIX): CRUSADERS GONE WILD!

This is the sixth part of Deadliest Blogger’s politically incorrect look at the Crusades. Considering the sheer volume of material and scope of history involved, this can only be a cursory examination of the Crusades*; with the politically correct blinders removed. In this part we will look at the First Crusade, and the establishment of the Christian Crusader States in Syria and Palestine.

(For Part Five, go here; or, to start from the beginning, go here!)

_____________________________________________________________

In 1204 a singular event occurred which shook the western world: Constantinople, capital of the Eastern Roman (“Byzantine”) Empire, long the impregnable bastion of Eastern Christendom and bulwark against Islamic expansion, was captured and sacked. Not by its Muslim enemies, but by an army of Christian “Crusaders”.

Thus the 13th century began with one of the greatest blights on the history of the Crusader movement. For the rest of the century one crusade after another was misdirected, seemingly attacking everywhere except to recover Jerusalem and the Holy Land.

From 1204 until 1272 Christian Europe launched eight Crusades (only six of which are counted as “official” Crusades). Of these, only two actually arrived in the Holy Land.

The Crusader movement had indeed “gone wild”!

It should be remembered that the original purpose of the Crusades, motivated by Pope Urban II’s sermon at Clermont in 1095, was to succor the beleaguered Christian empire of Byzantium from the Seljuk Turks; and to recover Jerusalem and the Holy Land, captured by the Muslims in the 7th century. Yet in 1204, just 109 years later, Constantinople was captured and sacked by a Crusader army.

How had this movement become so misdirected?

1387326.jpg Constantinople, “Miklagaard” the Golden City to the Vikings, was the greatest city in Europe till 1204. Within its walls were priceless works of art and literature from the Classic Age of Greece and Rome. The 4th Crusade arrive here in 1203 to return an exiled prince to power. Known today as Istanbul (below), the “Golden City” still echoes the glories of its imperial past. 1387463

The answer is that like all things created by man, the Crusades were able to be turned to the uses of the venial and corrupt; to be twisted for their own purposes by powerful and ambitious men.

THE FOURTH CRUSADE

The Third Crusade had failed to liberate Jerusalem; ending instead with a negotiated settlement between Richard the Lionheart and Saladin (See Part Five here). The dust had barely settled when the new Pope, Innocent III, was preaching another Crusade (1198). After some time and effort, the Fourth Crusade was launched.

The target of the Crusade was not Jerusalem or the Holy Land at all. But instead Egypt, the heart of the late Saladin’s Ayyubid empire, was where the Crusade would be directed. Defeating the Ayyubid forces there would cripple Muslim power in the region and allow for a relatively easy restoration of Jerusalem.

In 1202, a 13,000 strong Crusader army, composed chiefly of French and Flemish forces and led by Boniface, Marquess of Montferrat (younger brother to the late Conrad of Montferrat, Crusader King Jerusalem and cousin to Frederick I Barbarossa); contracted with the blind Doge (ruler) of Venice, Enrico (Henry) Dandolo, for transport to Egypt. From there, it was planned to deliver a crippling blow to the Ayyubids; the successors of Saladin who ruled both Egypt and Syria. From here, it was thought Jerusalem could subsequently be liberated.

1387211

Enrico (Henry) Dandolo, the “Blind Doge” of Venice

However, the cost of transportation was more than the Crusaders could pay. They reached a compromise with the Venetians: to stop in route and capture the Adriatic coastal city of Zara; a former Venetian dependency now aligned with Hungry. As the Crusader army invested the city, the terrified citizens hung banners marked with crosses from the battlements and windows of the city to show that they were fellow Catholics. This did not save them, and the Crusader forces nevertheless stormed the city, followed by the usual sack-and-pillage.

The unscrupulous Enrico Dandolo had thus used the zealous but impoverished Franks to achieve Venetian political ends, however irrelevant to the goals of the Crusade.

When word reached Pope Innocent III, he was immediately outraged at this attack upon fellow Christians. In a letter to the army’s leadership, the Holy Father threatened the Crusaders with excommunication. However, the Crusader leaders did not disclose the Pope’s letters to the rank-and-file, who continued to believe they had Papal absolution for any acts committed while on Crusade.

At this junction, an exiled Byzantine prince arrived in the Crusader camp, and history reached one of its turning points.

Alexios IV Angelos was the son of the deposed Emperor Isaac II Angelos. He now joined the Crusader camp as a guest of Boniface of Montferrat. Alexios Angelos offered the cash-strapped Crusaders a seemingly splendid offer: restore him to the Byzantine throne, overthrowing in the process the reigning “usurper”, his uncle Alexios III. In return, the exiled prince offered to pay the entire debt still owed to the Venetians, along with a further donation of 200,000 silver marks from the imperial treasury. He promised 10,000 Byzantine professional soldiers for the Crusade, and to undertake the maintenance of 500 Frankish knights to be stationed in the recaptured Holy Land. He further pledged the service of the Byzantine navy to aid in the transport the Crusader forces to Egypt. Finally (and perhaps most tantalizing) he offered to place the Orthodox Church under the authority of the Pope in Rome!

This was a staggering offer! Though the wily Dandolo, who had extensive knowledge of the situation in Byzantium, must have known that these were pipe dreams well beyond the ability of any Byzantine Emperor to deliver (the Empire’s treasury was near empty, her once proud fleet mostly scrapped, and neither the Orthodox clergy nor the people of Constantinople would ever submit to the Pope’s authority) the less informed Frankish leaders were eager to accept Alexios’ offer. Doge Dandolo had his own reason for encouraging the redirection of the Crusade to Constantinople.

1387227.jpgByzantium had once been the master of Venice, then its ally, and in the last century a commercial rival. Like many other states, the Venetians had long maintained a merchant community resident in Constantinople. The Venetians had proven to be bad guests in the city, brawling with their rivals the Genoese in the streets and demonstrating scorn for the city’s Greek citizens. In 1171, the Emperor Manuel I Comnenus had expelled the Venetians from the Empire, confiscating all of their property. A brief war had followed, and a state of tension had existed ever since.

Some historians have speculated that Enrico Dandolo had a more personal grudge against the Byzantines. It has been suggested that he lost his eye site as a younger man, as a result of a blow to the head received from the Greeks during a riot in Constantinople. However tantalizing it is to add a personal motivation to Dandolo’s actions and what was to come, there is no proof that the Doge lost his sight in Constantinople. The historian of the Crusade, Geoffrey de Villehardouin (who fought in the Crusade and knew Dandolo personally) states only that he lost his sight after a head wound.

The Doge needed no more motivation than that here, with the Crusaders willing to divert their efforts against Constantinople, he had found the perfect means of striking a blow against his city’s enemy, and to greatly expand Venetian power.

1387324 (1)The Crusader armada arrived at the great city at the beginning of July, 1203. Landing outside the suburb of Galatia, across the Golden Horn (the main harbor-inlet of the city) from Constantinople, they found themselves opposed by the Byzantine army drawn up for battle. The Frankish knights disembarked and charged immediately. The fury of their attack routed the Byzantine forces, some of whom fled into Galatia. The Franks, hot on their heals, captured the gates of this vital suburb, and with it the Tower of Galatia (not to be confused with the later Genoese construct). This fortress warded the entrance to the Golden Horn. A chain normally stretched across the harbor, from the Galatia Tower to a similar bastion on the Constantinople side. With the Galatia Tower captured, this “boom” was lowered, and the Venetian armada sailed into the Golden Horn.

1387471The sun setting over modern Istanbul, seen from the waters of the city’s splendid natural harbor, the Golden Horn. It was from here that the Venetian fleet attacked the city’s weaker sea wall.

The Crusader army set up camp to the northwest of the city, opposite the Blachernae Palace, the residence of the Imperial family. On July 17 the siege began in earnest with the Franks attacking the land walls, while the Venetians assaulted the weaker seawall guarding the harbor-side of the city.

1387404.jpgConstantinople boasted the strongest defenses of any city in the Western World.

Positioned on a broad peninsula, the landward side was guarded by the “Theodosian Walls”, a defensive system of triple walls. The outer-most and lowest wall was a mere breastwork, defended by a water-filled moat (though by 1204 the moat had long been left in disrepair and was but a weed-choked dry ditch). The middle wall was some 27 feet high, and was in turn overlooked by an even higher inner wall, whose towers reached up to 70 feet. Each wall could provide covering fire over the one before it.

1387405.jpg
1387406.jpgConstantinople had been besieged before: By Sassanid Persians, Avars, and Slavs, the Muslim Arabs (twice: in 674–678 and again in 717–718), by the Bulgars, by the Rus (three times, in 860907, and in 941), and by native Byzantine forces during time of civil war.

Never before had it fallen.

However, this was the first time the Golden Horn had fallen to an attacker, and while the Franks tied down the best Byzantine troops (the elite Varangian Guard) near the Blachernae, Venetian galleys sporting siege ladders assaulted the much weaker harbor wall. When the Varangians rushed to repulse the Venetians swarming over the battlements and into the harbor district, the Venetians set fire to that quarter before retreating. The fire greatly damaged the city, destroying some 120 acres of houses and shops, leaving some 20,000 residents homeless.

1387410.jpg The sea walls of Constantinople were strong, but not as strong as those on the land side. It was here that the Venetians were able to assault into the city from the harbor (below).
1387411.jpgAlexios III now led a large part of the garrison outside the city, against the Franks opposite the Blachernae district. Despite outnumbering the Crusaders, the Emperor lost his nerve and retreated back into the city without striking a blow! This disgrace turned the army against him, and Alexios fled the city, taking with him much of what remained of the treasury. The Byzantine officers deposed the Emperor, and releasing the deposed  Isaac II returned him to the imperial throne.

This put an end to the fighting. The Franks had achieved the deposition of the “usurper”, and placed the “rightful” ruler on the throne. But eight years of imprisonment (and blinding) had left Isaac II enfeebled and his wits addled. So, it was agreed by both sides that his son would be made co-Emperor, as Alexios IV.

But in Alexios they were very soon disappointed, as it became apparent that his promises were hollow. In an attempt to pay the Crusaders the promised silver, he ordered bejeweled and gilded religious icons to be stripped and melted down; as well as handing over whatever of value remained to the church or in the Imperial Palace. This shocked and estranged the Byzantine populace, who quickly turned against the Angelos Emperors. Fighting in the streets broke out between angry mobs and the Crusader forces, supporting their puppet-Emperor. Fire was again used as a weapon, as large portions of the city were burned down by the Venetians as a way of driving back the mobs.

The situation reached a boiling point in January of 1204. A nobleman of the Imperial Court, Alexios Doukas (nicknamed “Mourtzouphlos” because of his thick eyebrows), staged a coup; overthrowing Alexious IV and subsequently having him strangled. His father, Isaac II, apparently died of shock at this turn of events.

The Crusaders camped outside the walls,  incensed at the overthrow and death of their ally, demanded that Mourtzouphlos honor the agreements made to them by Alexios IV. Mourtzouphlos refused, and the Crusaders renewed their attacks on the city.

However, the new Emperor was a soldier of some ability, and with the support of the army and citizens was able to repulse all attacks for two days. But on the third day of assaults, the new emperor lost his nerve, and fled the city. Despite this, the army fought on; the Varangians in particular inflicting bloody casualties upon the Venetians along the sea wall. On April 12, 1204, the Crusaders used fire to push back the defenders and to expand foot holds gained within the walls. Much of the city was damaged, and its residents turned into refugees. Finally, on April 13, the city fell to the Crusaders.

1387431What followed was the most shameful chapter in the history of the Crusades; as Constantinople, capital of the ancient Eastern Roman Empire, was subjected to three days of vicious sack-and-pillage. Nothing and no one was spared: not churches or monasteries, nor palaces or the lowest hovels. Rape and murder were the order of the day. One author described the scene thus:

The Latin soldiery subjected the greatest city in Europe to an indescribable sack. For three days they murdered, raped, looted and destroyed on a scale which even the ancient Vandals and Goths would have found unbelievable. Constantinople had become a veritable museum of ancient and Byzantine art, an emporium of such incredible wealth that the Latins were astounded at the riches they found. Though the Venetians had an appreciation for the art which they discovered (they were themselves semi-Byzantines) and saved much of it, the French and others destroyed indiscriminately, halting to refresh themselves with wine, violation of nuns, and murder of Orthodox clerics. The Crusaders vented their hatred for the Greeks most spectacularly in the desecration of the greatest Church in Christendom. They smashed the silver iconostasis, the icons and the holy books of Hagia Sophia, and seated upon the patriarchal throne a whore who sang coarse songs as they drank wine from the Church’s holy vessels. The estrangement of East and West, which had proceeded over the centuries, culminated in the horrible massacre that accompanied the conquest of Constantinople.

1387437The Crusading movement had reached a moment of supreme irony: partially started in response to an appeal by their Byzantine co-religionists for aid against the Turks; the Fourth Crusade saw Byzantium sacked as savagely by the Christian Franks as it would have been had it fallen to its Seljuk enemies.

AFTERMATH

Following the fall of the city, the Crusader lords would divide up the remnants of the Byzantine Empire between themselves. Baldwin of Flanders would be named “Emperor” of a Latin Empire, set up to replace Byzantium. Boniface of Montferrat would be named King of Thessalonica. Geoffrey of Villehardouin and William I of Champlitte would conquer Athens and the Peloponnese, setting up the Principality of Morea, which would endure for a century. All the Crusader states established upon the ruins of Byzantium would eventually be recovered by the Byzantines in the following century.

Byzantium, however, would never recover. Its last centuries would be spent recovering its territories from the “Latins”, under the Palaeologus dynasty; and in defending itself from the growing power of its Ottoman Turkish neighbors. Constantinople, once the largest city in Europe, would become a virtual ghost town. Even after it was recaptured by the Byzantines in 1261, it never recovered either its population or its power. Large swaths of the city were never rebuilt after the fires of 1204. When the Ottoman Turks finally captured the city in 1453, it was but a hollow shell within its still-great walls.

1387448.jpgThe melancholy ruins of the Blachernae Palace, once residence of the Medieval Byzantine Emperors and seat of power of one Europe’s most powerful and prosperous realms. It was in this section of the walls that the Franks broke into the city in April, 1204

 

NEXT: THE LAST CRUSADES

 

Some of the artwork in this article has been reproduced with the permission of Osprey Publishing, and is © Osprey Publishing, part of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
www.ospreypublishing.com

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to A POLITICALLY INCORRECT HISTORY OF THE CRUSADES (PART SIX): CRUSADERS GONE WILD!

  1. Pingback: THE CRUSADES (PART 5): DISASTER AT HATTIN AND THE THIRD CRUSADE | The Deadliest Blogger: Military History Page

  2. Pingback: MYRIOCEPHALON, 1176: BYZANTINE RESURGENCE COMES TO A DISASTROUS END | The Deadliest Blogger: Military History Page

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s